Service interruption via monitor-count signedness conversion
Published May 8, 2026 · Updated May 8, 2026
Denial of service in the Linux Kernel Ceph client allows remote attackers to interrupt service via a crafted monitor map message. ceph_monmap_decode stores the unsigned num_mon field in a signed int, so a large value becomes negative, bypasses the CEPH_MAX_MON bound, and drives an oversized monmap allocation. A target must use the kernel Ceph client and decode an attacker-controlled monitor map; the documented outcome is allocation failure and an incorrect error return, not code execution or data access.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in the Linux Kernel Ceph client allows remote attackers to interrupt service via a crafted monitor map message. ceph_monmap_decode stores the unsigned num_mon field in a signed int, so a large value becomes negative, bypasses the CEPH_MAX_MON bound, and drives an oversized monmap allocation. A target must use the kernel Ceph client and decode an attacker-controlled monitor map; the documented outcome is allocation failure and an incorrect error return, not code execution or data access.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-43405
- Published
- May 8, 2026
- Updated
- May 8, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- CWE-908, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 8, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <08bc6173fd611ad5a40f472bf5f15b92aea0fe40
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <5f2806684b05bd24d05c091083b8e2517ba8ffac
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <770444611f047dbfd4517ec0bc1b179d40c2f346
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <86f7060cd638d6eb042e8ed780fb83a59ca0dcb3
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <b268984ae88cb0dcd7a8e8263962c748448e26e8
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <ba0a4df8c563536857dcbf7b4dbd0f2a15f57ace
- Affected versionversion=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 <ee5588e2bc41acb73f6676c0520420c107cd0140
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo