Adjacent pairing downgrade via omitted MITM flag
Published May 8, 2026 · Updated May 8, 2026
Authentication-policy bypass in affected Linux Kernel releases allows physically proximate attackers to compromise Bluetooth pairing. In smp_cmd_pairing_req(), the responder copies the initiator's auth_req before enforcing BT_SECURITY_HIGH, so tk_request() can select JUST_CFM without MITM authentication. The target must require high Bluetooth security and accept pairing from a nearby unauthenticated peer; the downgrade exposes protected traffic, keys, and service operations to interception, alteration, or disruption.
Summary
What happened
Authentication-policy bypass in affected Linux Kernel releases allows physically proximate attackers to compromise Bluetooth pairing. In smp_cmd_pairing_req(), the responder copies the initiator's auth_req before enforcing BT_SECURITY_HIGH, so tk_request() can select JUST_CFM without MITM authentication. The target must require high Bluetooth security and accept pairing from a nearby unauthenticated peer; the downgrade exposes protected traffic, keys, and service operations to interception, alteration, or disruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-43334
- Published
- May 8, 2026
- Updated
- May 8, 2026
- Vendor
- The Linux Kernel Organization
- Product
- Linux Kernel
- Classifications
- T1557
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 8, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 8, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <01bb4045d2306c266178f49ce0c3576d237a3040
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <425a22c5373d4e1b46492ab869074ebeeade61f3
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <7ab69426e7ecbd18a222ee2ec87ca612d30197d7
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <91649c02c1baaa18cedf7fb425fa1f0f852c8183
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <c8ff0ca6508535bccabd81c5c9dcc63de8a3d4fb
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <d05111bfe37bfd8bd4d2dfe6675d6bdeef43f7c7
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <ec17efb1ef91506cfd17a77692eaf4bbacb520ea
- Affected versionversion=2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 <fa14e0e19820b1bbdb42185c9c4efa950bcffef9
- Affected versionversion=3.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo