Service interruption via nonterminating ePVA traffic processing
Published May 13, 2026 · Updated May 13, 2026
Denial of service in F5 BIG-IP FastL4 virtual servers allows remote attackers to interrupt service via local Ethernet traffic. F5 maps the flaw to an infinite loop but does not disclose the traffic pattern or ePVA/TMM processing locus that fails to terminate. Reachability requires adjacent-network access to affected hardware and an ePVA-offloaded FastL4 profile; no confidentiality or integrity impact is reported.
Summary
What happened
Denial of service in F5 BIG-IP FastL4 virtual servers allows remote attackers to interrupt service via local Ethernet traffic. F5 maps the flaw to an infinite loop but does not disclose the traffic pattern or ePVA/TMM processing locus that fails to terminate. Reachability requires adjacent-network access to affected hardware and an ePVA-offloaded FastL4 profile; no confidentiality or integrity impact is reported.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-42781
- Published
- May 13, 2026
- Updated
- May 13, 2026
- Vendor
- F5 Networks
- Product
- BIG-IP
- Classifications
- CWE-835, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- adjacent
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=17.1.0 <17.1.3.1
- Affected versionversion=17.5.0 <17.5.1.4
- Affected versionversion=21.0.0 <21.0.0.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo