Unauthenticated file manipulation via prefixed metadata tags
Published May 14, 2026 · Updated May 14, 2026
File manipulation in Gotenberg before 8.30.0 allows remote attackers to rename, move, link, or change attributes of server files. The metadata-write blocklist compares complete keys against four pseudo-tags, but ExifTool strips accepted group prefixes before interpreting those keys; three attribute-changing pseudo-tags are also omitted. The route has no authentication by default, and mounted volumes or non-container deployments extend the consequence to arbitrary file reads and overwrites.
Summary
What happened
File manipulation in Gotenberg before 8.30.0 allows remote attackers to rename, move, link, or change attributes of server files. The metadata-write blocklist compares complete keys against four pseudo-tags, but ExifTool strips accepted group prefixes before interpreting those keys; three attribute-changing pseudo-tags are also omitted. The route has no authentication by default, and mounted volumes or non-container deployments extend the consequence to arbitrary file reads and overwrites.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-42590
- Published
- May 14, 2026
- Updated
- May 14, 2026
- Vendor
- Gotenberg
- Product
- Gotenberg
- Classifications
- CWE-184, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 14, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 14, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 8.30.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Vendor metadata group-prefix proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo