CSRF escalation via unconditional HTTP method override
Published May 13, 2026 · Updated May 13, 2026
Interpretation conflict in Flight before 3.18.1 allows remote attackers to execute unsafe routes through crafted method-override inputs. The Request::getMethod() routine treats the X-HTTP-Method-Override header and _method request parameter as authoritative on every verb, so a GET can be dispatched as DELETE or PUT. An unauthenticated request reaches the flaw when an application exposes an unsafe route, enabling destructive CSRF, verb-gated middleware bypass, or cache poisoning.
Summary
What happened
Interpretation conflict in Flight before 3.18.1 allows remote attackers to execute unsafe routes through crafted method-override inputs. The Request::getMethod() routine treats the X-HTTP-Method-Override header and _method request parameter as authoritative on every verb, so a GET can be dispatched as DELETE or PUT. An unauthenticated request reaches the flaw when an application exposes an unsafe route, enabling destructive CSRF, verb-gated middleware bypass, or cache poisoning.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-42551
- Published
- May 13, 2026
- Updated
- May 13, 2026
- Vendor
- FlightPHP
- Product
- Flight
- Classifications
- CWE-436, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 13, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 13, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 3.18.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- GitHub advisory HTTP method-override proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo