Session and token disruption via state-changing GET requests
Published Jun 4, 2026 · Updated Jun 4, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in DFIR-IRIS iris-web before 2.4.28 allows remote attackers to rotate API tokens or end user sessions. The /user/token/renew and /logout handlers accept state-changing GET requests, so GET requests bypass the application's CSRF-token protection. A victim must have an active session and load attacker-controlled content; token rotation invalidates integrations using the prior token, while logout ends only the victim's session.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in DFIR-IRIS iris-web before 2.4.28 allows remote attackers to rotate API tokens or end user sessions. The /user/token/renew and /logout handlers accept state-changing GET requests, so GET requests bypass the application's CSRF-token protection. A victim must have an active session and load attacker-controlled content; token rotation invalidates integrations using the prior token, while logout ends only the victim's session.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-42543
- Published
- Jun 4, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 4, 2026
- Vendor
- DFIR-IRIS
- Product
- iris-web
- Classifications
- CWE-650, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 4, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 4, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 2.4.28
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- SBA Research CSRF proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo