Unauthenticated command execution via firewall.cgi handlers
Published May 4, 2026 · Updated May 4, 2026
OS command injection in WDR201A WiFi Extender firmware 1.02 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands. Five firewall.cgi handlers feed request values into shell-backed iptables commands; two omit filtering and three block only semicolons, so $() substitution remains executable. No authentication or user interaction is required, and injected values persist in NVRAM and execute again whenever firewall.cgi runs.
Summary
What happened
OS command injection in WDR201A WiFi Extender firmware 1.02 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands. Five firewall.cgi handlers feed request values into shell-backed iptables commands; two omit filtering and three block only semicolons, so $() substitution remains executable. No authentication or user interaction is required, and injected values persist in NVRAM and execute again whenever firewall.cgi runs.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-41926
- Published
- May 4, 2026
- Updated
- May 4, 2026
- Vendor
- Shenzhen Yipu Commercial and Trading Co., Ltd
- Product
- WDR201A WiFi Extender
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 4, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 4, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.02
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- firewall.cgi command-injection proof of conceptproof of concept · validated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo