Session-token theft via unsafe confirmation rendering
Published May 11, 2026 · Updated May 11, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Taiga Front before 6.9.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute JavaScript in another user's browser. ConfirmService passes a crafted issue or user-story title through textToHTML and inserts the result into confirmation dialogs with .html(). A low-privilege user can store the payload, but a victim must open the affected deletion confirmation and interact with its rendered content; the script can read the session token held in local storage.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in Taiga Front before 6.9.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute JavaScript in another user's browser. ConfirmService passes a crafted issue or user-story title through textToHTML and inserts the result into confirmation dialogs with .html(). A low-privilege user can store the payload, but a victim must open the affected deletion confirmation and interact with its rendered content; the script can read the session token held in local storage.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-41250
- Published
- May 11, 2026
- Updated
- May 11, 2026
- Vendor
- Taiga
- Product
- Taiga Front
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1539
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 11, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 11, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 6.9.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Neodyme confirmation-dialog XSS proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo