Local code execution via incompatible pointer type
Published May 12, 2026 · Updated May 12, 2026
Type confusion in Microsoft Word across affected Office and SharePoint releases allows local users to execute arbitrary code. Word accesses a resource through an incompatible pointer type, causing an untrusted pointer dereference; Microsoft has not disclosed the specific parser or function. Exploitation requires local reachability of the vulnerable processing path, and successful execution runs code in the affected Word or SharePoint context.
Summary
What happened
Type confusion in Microsoft Word across affected Office and SharePoint releases allows local users to execute arbitrary code. Word accesses a resource through an incompatible pointer type, causing an untrusted pointer dereference; Microsoft has not disclosed the specific parser or function. Exploitation requires local reachability of the vulnerable processing path, and successful execution runs code in the affected Word or SharePoint context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-40367
- Published
- May 12, 2026
- Updated
- May 12, 2026
- Vendor
- Microsoft
- Product
- Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024
- Classifications
- CWE-822, T1203
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 12, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 12, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=16.0.0 <16.109.26051019
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo