Information disclosure via projection-bypassing distinct queries
Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Apr 15, 2026
Authorization bypass in ApostropheCMS 4.28.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to read protected field values through REST queries. The choices and counts builders run MongoDB distinct() before publicApiProjection is applied, then return unfiltered results because distinct() ignores projections. Unauthenticated access to a piece-type or page API with publicApiProjection or viewPermission restrictions exposes unique values, while counts also exposes document totals.
Summary
What happened
Authorization bypass in ApostropheCMS 4.28.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to read protected field values through REST queries. The choices and counts builders run MongoDB distinct() before publicApiProjection is applied, then return unfiltered results because distinct() ignores projections. Unauthenticated access to a piece-type or page API with publicApiProjection or viewPermission restrictions exposes unique values, while counts also exposes document totals.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-39857
- Published
- Apr 15, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- Vendor
- Apostrophe Technologies
- Product
- ApostropheCMS
- Classifications
- CWE-200, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 15, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 15, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 4.29.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Vendor choices/counts REST query proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo