Authorization bypass via mutable group-name policy lookup
Published Apr 9, 2026 · Updated Apr 9, 2026
Authorization bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.3.25 allows remote authenticated users to access protected Google Chat resources. The Google Chat inbound access policy matches configured groups by mutable space display names instead of stable space IDs, allowing renamed or colliding spaces to inherit another group's policy. Exploitation requires Google Chat space access and the ability to change or collide its display name, exposing policy-protected commands, prompts, or resources without host-level control.
Summary
What happened
Authorization bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.3.25 allows remote authenticated users to access protected Google Chat resources. The Google Chat inbound access policy matches configured groups by mutable space display names instead of stable space IDs, allowing renamed or colliding spaces to inherit another group's policy. Exploitation requires Google Chat space access and the ability to change or collide its display name, exposing policy-protected commands, prompts, or resources without host-level control.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-35617
- Published
- Apr 9, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 9, 2026
- Vendor
- OpenClaw Foundation
- Product
- OpenClaw
- Classifications
- CWE-807, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 9, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 9, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2026.3.25
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo