Session hijacking via unescaped person properties
Published Apr 7, 2026 · Updated Apr 7, 2026
Stored XSS in ChurchCRM before 7.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to run JavaScript in another user's browser via person properties. PropertyAssign.php emits stored values without HTML escaping, while PersonView.js passes decoded property prompts to jQuery .html() instead of text(). Any authenticated account can plant a payload, but another user must view the affected record; execution in that user's session enables session theft or unauthorized actions.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in ChurchCRM before 7.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to run JavaScript in another user's browser via person properties. PropertyAssign.php emits stored values without HTML escaping, while PersonView.js passes decoded property prompts to jQuery .html() instead of text(). Any authenticated account can plant a payload, but another user must view the affected record; execution in that user's session enables session theft or unauthorized actions.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-35576
- Published
- Apr 7, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 7, 2026
- Vendor
- ChurchCRM
- Product
- ChurchCRM
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1539
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 7, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 7, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 7.0.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GitHub Security Advisory proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo