Service crash via wrapped join-message length
Published Apr 1, 2026 · Updated Apr 1, 2026
Integer overflow in Corosync join-message validation allows remote attackers to crash the service with crafted UDP packets. In exec/totemsrp.c, check_memb_join_sanity() adds attacker-controlled 32-bit proc_list_entries and failed_list_entries before promotion to size_t, so wraparound understates required_len and admits a short packet. Unauthenticated network access reaches the flaw only when Corosync uses totemudp or totemudpu mode; the bounded consequence is a service crash.
Summary
What happened
Integer overflow in Corosync join-message validation allows remote attackers to crash the service with crafted UDP packets. In exec/totemsrp.c, check_memb_join_sanity() adds attacker-controlled 32-bit proc_list_entries and failed_list_entries before promotion to size_t, so wraparound understates required_len and admits a short packet. Unauthenticated network access reaches the flaw only when Corosync uses totemudp or totemudpu mode; the bounded consequence is a service crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-35092
- Published
- Apr 1, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Classifications
- CWE-190, T1499.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 1, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 1, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo