CI command execution via untrusted workflow interpolation
Published Mar 24, 2026 · Updated Mar 24, 2026
Shell injection in Langflow OSS before 1.9.0 allows remote attackers to execute commands in GitHub Actions via a malicious pull request. Multiple repository workflows interpolate attacker-controlled branch names, pull request titles, and action inputs directly into shell run steps without neutralizing shell metacharacters. Exploitation requires a public fork with GitHub Actions enabled and grants access to runner secrets and release or image publishing operations available to the workflow.
Summary
What happened
Shell injection in Langflow OSS before 1.9.0 allows remote attackers to execute commands in GitHub Actions via a malicious pull request. Multiple repository workflows interpolate attacker-controlled branch names, pull request titles, and action inputs directly into shell run steps without neutralizing shell metacharacters. Exploitation requires a public fork with GitHub Actions enabled and grants access to runner secrets and release or image publishing operations available to the workflow.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-33475
- Published
- Mar 24, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 24, 2026
- Vendor
- OpenBMC Project
- Product
- Langflow OSS
- Classifications
- CWE-78, CWE-74, T1059
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 24, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 24, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.9.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Malicious pull-request branch-name shell-injection proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo