Internal behavior disclosure via unvalidated SUPI path
Published Mar 20, 2026 · Updated Mar 20, 2026
Improper error handling in free5GC UDM before 1.4.2 allows remote attackers to expose internal request-processing behavior. HandleModify accepts an empty UE ID from a double-slash Nudm_SDM path, forwards the malformed request to UDR as PUT, and converts its 400 response into 500 SYSTEM_FAILURE. The attacker must reach the UDM Nudm_SDM service; the consequence is erroneous failure signaling and disclosure of downstream handling, not reported data access or modification.
Summary
What happened
Improper error handling in free5GC UDM before 1.4.2 allows remote attackers to expose internal request-processing behavior. HandleModify accepts an empty UE ID from a double-slash Nudm_SDM path, forwards the malformed request to UDR as PUT, and converts its 400 response into 500 SYSTEM_FAILURE. The attacker must reach the UDM Nudm_SDM service; the consequence is erroneous failure signaling and disclosure of downstream handling, not reported data access or modification.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-33192
- Published
- Mar 20, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 20, 2026
- Vendor
- free5GC
- Product
- free5GC
- Classifications
- CWE-209
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 20, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 20, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.4.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Issue 784 empty-SUPI PATCH reproductionproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo