Directory permission modification via symlink-following chmod
Published Mar 20, 2026 · Updated Mar 20, 2026
Symlink following in composefs tar-rs 0.4.44 and earlier allows attackers to change permissions on directories outside an extraction root. In unpack_dir, an EEXIST path check calls fs::metadata(), follows an archive-created symlink, accepts its target as a directory, and later applies the entry's mode with chmod. A crafted archive must be unpacked; the demonstrated consequence is directory-mode modification, not file-content access or code execution.
Summary
What happened
Symlink following in composefs tar-rs 0.4.44 and earlier allows attackers to change permissions on directories outside an extraction root. In unpack_dir, an EEXIST path check calls fs::metadata(), follows an archive-created symlink, accepts its target as a directory, and later applies the entry's mode with chmod. A crafted archive must be unpacked; the demonstrated consequence is directory-mode modification, not file-content access or code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-33056
- Published
- Mar 20, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 20, 2026
- Vendor
- composefs
- Product
- tar-rs
- Classifications
- CWE-61, T1222.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 20, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 20, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.4.45
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-j4xf-2g29-59ph crafted-archive reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo