Authentication token exposure via owner-ID hash reuse
Published Mar 21, 2026 · Updated Mar 21, 2026
Key management errors in OpenClaw before 2026.2.22 allow attackers to derive gateway tokens from owner-ID hashes in model prompts. The CLI and embedded-agent prompt builders use gateway.auth.token or gateway.remote.token when hash display is enabled without a dedicated ownerDisplaySecret. Exploitation requires access to third-party model system prompts and is most practical against weak gateway tokens; the advisory reports no direct plaintext token disclosure.
Summary
What happened
Key management errors in OpenClaw before 2026.2.22 allow attackers to derive gateway tokens from owner-ID hashes in model prompts. The CLI and embedded-agent prompt builders use gateway.auth.token or gateway.remote.token when hash display is enabled without a dedicated ownerDisplaySecret. Exploitation requires access to third-party model system prompts and is most practical against weak gateway tokens; the advisory reports no direct plaintext token disclosure.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-32897
- Published
- Mar 21, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 21, 2026
- Vendor
- OpenClaw Foundation
- Product
- OpenClaw
- Classifications
- CWE-522, CWE-320, T1110.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 21, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 21, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <2026.2.22
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo