Authenticated file deletion via path traversal
Published Mar 25, 2026 · Updated Mar 25, 2026
Path traversal in iCopyDoc YML for Yandex Market before 5.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to delete arbitrary server files. Public advisories identify insufficient path validation in an unspecified file-deletion function, allowing crafted paths to escape the intended directory. Shop Manager-level access or higher is required; deleting WordPress files can interrupt the site and, for selected files such as wp-config.php, enable code execution.
Summary
What happened
Path traversal in iCopyDoc YML for Yandex Market before 5.3.0 allows remote authenticated users to delete arbitrary server files. Public advisories identify insufficient path validation in an unspecified file-deletion function, allowing crafted paths to escape the intended directory. Shop Manager-level access or higher is required; deleting WordPress files can interrupt the site and, for selected files such as wp-config.php, enable code execution.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-32567
- Published
- Mar 25, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 25, 2026
- Vendor
- Maxim Glazunov
- Product
- YML for Yandex Market
- Classifications
- CWE-22, T1485
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 25, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 25, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=< 5.3.0 changes=[{"at":"5.3.0","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo