Memory corruption via truncated NAL length field
Published Sep 8, 2026 · Updated Sep 9, 2026
Memory corruption in FFmpeg before 8.1 allows attackers to crash the process via a crafted H.264 or HEVC file during RTP encoding. In ff_rtp_send_h264_hevc(), a truncated length-prefixed NAL advances the buffer pointer beyond the remaining data, so nal_send() passes a negative byte count to memcpy. The target must process the crafted file through the RTP muxer; the published reproducer demonstrates an AddressSanitizer abort, while code execution is not established.
Summary
What happened
Memory corruption in FFmpeg before 8.1 allows attackers to crash the process via a crafted H.264 or HEVC file during RTP encoding. In ff_rtp_send_h264_hevc(), a truncated length-prefixed NAL advances the buffer pointer beyond the remaining data, so nal_send() passes a negative byte count to memcpy. The target must process the crafted file through the RTP muxer; the published reproducer demonstrates an AddressSanitizer abort, while code execution is not established.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-30754
- Published
- Sep 8, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 9, 2026
- Vendor
- Unknown vendor
- Product
- Unknown product
- Classifications
- T1203
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Sep 8, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Sep 9, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Affected products and versions are unavailable in this record.
Published CVSS scores
No CVSS assessment is available in this record.
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- momo-trip FFmpeg crafted-input reproducerproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo