Subscriber-level internal resource access via arbitrary requests
Published Mar 5, 2026 · Updated Mar 5, 2026
Server-side request forgery in Skat Design Ratatouille 1.2.6 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to send arbitrary server-side requests. Public materials do not identify the affected theme component, input parameter, or outbound-request operation that accepts an attacker-controlled destination. Subscriber-level access is required, and successful exploitation can reach internal services or disclose data available to the WordPress server.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in Skat Design Ratatouille 1.2.6 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to send arbitrary server-side requests. Public materials do not identify the affected theme component, input parameter, or outbound-request operation that accepts an attacker-controlled destination. Subscriber-level access is required, and successful exploitation can reach internal services or disclose data available to the WordPress server.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-28036
- Published
- Mar 5, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 5, 2026
- Vendor
- Skat Design
- Product
- Ratatouille
- Classifications
- CWE-918, CAPEC-664, T1090.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 5, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 5, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 1.2.6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo