Unauthenticated code execution via exposed Python REPL
Published Feb 26, 2026 · Updated Feb 26, 2026
Code injection in Langflow OSS before 1.8.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python and OS commands through CSV Agent prompts. The CSV Agent hardcodes allow_dangerous_code as true, exposing LangChain's python_repl_ast tool and executing model-selected actions on the server. A reachable flow containing the CSV Agent and an attached LLM is required; no setting disables the tool, so injected prompts run with the server process's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Code injection in Langflow OSS before 1.8.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python and OS commands through CSV Agent prompts. The CSV Agent hardcodes allow_dangerous_code as true, exposing LangChain's python_repl_ast tool and executing model-selected actions on the server. A reachable flow containing the CSV Agent and an attached LLM is required; no setting disables the tool, so injected prompts run with the server process's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-27966
- Published
- Feb 26, 2026
- Updated
- Feb 26, 2026
- Vendor
- OpenBMC Project
- Product
- Langflow OSS
- Classifications
- CWE-94, T1059.006
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 26, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 26, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 1.8.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-3645-fxcv-hqr4 proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo