Code execution via unconstrained attachment download path
Published Mar 10, 2026 · Updated Mar 10, 2026
Arbitrary file write in sooperset MCP Atlassian before 0.17.0 allows remote attackers to execute code through a crafted attachment download. The confluence_download_attachment tool makes download_path absolute, creates its parent directories, and writes attachment bytes without enforcing containment. Access to the MCP tool and a readable attacker-controlled Confluence attachment is required; impact is limited to paths writable by the server process.
Summary
What happened
Arbitrary file write in sooperset MCP Atlassian before 0.17.0 allows remote attackers to execute code through a crafted attachment download. The confluence_download_attachment tool makes download_path absolute, creates its parent directories, and writes attachment bytes without enforcing containment. Access to the MCP tool and a readable attacker-controlled Confluence attachment is required; impact is limited to paths writable by the server process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-27825
- Published
- Mar 10, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 10, 2026
- Vendor
- sooperset
- Product
- MCP Atlassian
- Classifications
- CWE-22, CWE-73, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 10, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.17.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4 attachment-write proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo