Response disclosure and service interruption via desynchronization
Published Jul 14, 2026 · Updated Jul 14, 2026
HTTP request smuggling in SAP Approuter before 20.10.0 allows remote attackers to expose user responses and interrupt service. The router and an upstream HTTP component interpret a crafted request's message boundaries inconsistently, causing request-response desynchronization. No authentication or user interaction is required; SAP has not disclosed the conflicting header syntax or parser path, and the bounded impacts are response disclosure and service unavailability.
Summary
What happened
HTTP request smuggling in SAP Approuter before 20.10.0 allows remote attackers to expose user responses and interrupt service. The router and an upstream HTTP component interpret a crafted request's message boundaries inconsistently, causing request-response desynchronization. No authentication or user interaction is required; SAP has not disclosed the conflicting header syntax or parser path, and the bounded impacts are response disclosure and service unavailability.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-27690
- Published
- Jul 14, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 14, 2026
- Vendor
- cap-js
- Product
- SAP Approuter
- Classifications
- CWE-444, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 14, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 14, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=SAP Approuter node.js package < 20.10.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo