Service crash via unbounded filename copy
Published Jun 10, 2026 · Updated Jun 10, 2026
Stack-based buffer overflow in QNAP File Station 5 5.5.0 through 5.5.6.5242 allows remote attackers to crash its CGI service. The upload handler copies a multipart filename of 256 bytes or more into a fixed 256-byte stack buffer with strcpy, corrupting adjacent stack objects. Exploitation requires a low-privileged account with a writable directory, or a known share ID for a share with uploads enabled; demonstrated impact includes a service crash and stack-object corruption.
Summary
What happened
Stack-based buffer overflow in QNAP File Station 5 5.5.0 through 5.5.6.5242 allows remote attackers to crash its CGI service. The upload handler copies a multipart filename of 256 bytes or more into a fixed 256-byte stack buffer with strcpy, corrupting adjacent stack objects. Exploitation requires a low-privileged account with a writable directory, or a known share ID for a share with uploads enabled; demonstrated impact includes a service crash and stack-object corruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-26240
- Published
- Jun 10, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- Vendor
- Linn Products Limited
- Product
- File Station 5
- Classifications
- CWE-121, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 10, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 10, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=5.5.0 <5.5.6.5243
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- SySS multipart filename overflow proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo