Unauthorized commits via reversed maintainer-edit authorization
Published Jul 3, 2026 · Updated Jul 3, 2026
Incorrect authorization in Gitea 1.26.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users with repository read access to push arbitrary commits. PR creation accepts allow_maintainer_edit on a reversed fork without checking write access to the head repository, while CanMaintainerWriteToBranch checks base-repository ownership instead of the push target. Repository read access is sufficient to alter any readable repository, including public repositories, without legitimate write permission.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect authorization in Gitea 1.26.1 and earlier allows remote authenticated users with repository read access to push arbitrary commits. PR creation accepts allow_maintainer_edit on a reversed fork without checking write access to the head repository, while CanMaintainerWriteToBranch checks base-repository ownership instead of the push target. Repository read access is sufficient to alter any readable repository, including public repositories, without legitimate write permission.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-26231
- Published
- Jul 3, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 3, 2026
- Vendor
- Gitea
- Product
- Gitea
- Classifications
- CWE-863, T1190, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 3, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 3, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.26.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-mm7c-rhg6-qr4r poc.pyproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo