Remote code execution via unauthenticated P2P commands
Published Feb 9, 2026 · Updated Feb 9, 2026
Code injection in ZAI Shell before 9.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute system commands through unauthenticated P2P sharing. The P2P handler accepts attacker-controlled command messages on TCP port 5757 and passes approved content to run_command for subprocess execution without Sentinel checks. Reachability requires an active share start session in --no-ai mode, and execution requires the host user to approve the command; successful commands run with that user's privileges.
Summary
What happened
Code injection in ZAI Shell before 9.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute system commands through unauthenticated P2P sharing. The P2P handler accepts attacker-controlled command messages on TCP port 5757 and passes approved content to run_command for subprocess execution without Sentinel checks. Reachability requires an active share start session in --no-ai mode, and execution requires the host user to approve the command; successful commands run with that user's privileges.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-25807
- Published
- Feb 9, 2026
- Updated
- Feb 9, 2026
- Vendor
- TaklaXBR
- Product
- ZAI Shell
- Classifications
- CWE-94, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 9, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 9, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 9.0.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-6pjj-r955-34rr socket proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo