Privileged actions via forged authenticated requests
Published Feb 19, 2026 · Updated Feb 19, 2026
Cross-site request forgery in Themes4WP Popularis Extra 1.2.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unwanted privileged actions. The public record does not identify the affected request handler or the state-changing operation that accepts a forged request without verifying user intent. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to click a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form; resulting actions run with that user's permissions.
Summary
What happened
Cross-site request forgery in Themes4WP Popularis Extra 1.2.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to trigger unwanted privileged actions. The public record does not identify the affected request handler or the state-changing operation that accepts a forged request without verifying user intent. Exploitation requires a logged-in privileged user to click a malicious link, visit a crafted page, or submit a form; resulting actions run with that user's permissions.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-25422
- Published
- Feb 19, 2026
- Updated
- Feb 19, 2026
- Vendor
- Themes4WP
- Product
- Popularis Extra
- Classifications
- CWE-352, CAPEC-62, T1204.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 19, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 19, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 1.2.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo