Authenticated SSRF via insufficient link URL validation
Published Feb 19, 2026 · Updated Feb 19, 2026
Server-side request forgery in Qasem Alobaidi Extend Link 2.0.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to trigger server-side HTTP requests. The link-status checker accepts an editor-supplied URL and directs the WordPress host to request it without sufficient destination validation. Contributor-level access is required; crafted URLs can reach arbitrary external domains or internal services and expose response-derived information.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in Qasem Alobaidi Extend Link 2.0.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to trigger server-side HTTP requests. The link-status checker accepts an editor-supplied URL and directs the WordPress host to request it without sufficient destination validation. Contributor-level access is required; crafted URLs can reach arbitrary external domains or internal services and expose response-derived information.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-25310
- Published
- Feb 19, 2026
- Updated
- Feb 19, 2026
- Vendor
- Qasem Alobaidi
- Product
- Extend Link
- Classifications
- CWE-918, CAPEC-664, T1046
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Feb 19, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Feb 19, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=n/a <=<= 2.0.0 changes=[{"at":"2.0.1","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo