Command execution via unescaped Makefile build options
Published Jan 29, 2026 · Updated Jan 29, 2026
Command injection in Inspektor Gadget before 0.51.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands through a crafted gadget manifest. The ig image build path copies unescaped buildOptions values from build.yaml into Makefile.build commands, allowing shell substitution during make. Exploitation requires control of the full manifest or one of its build options; commands run on the Linux host with --local or inside the build container otherwise.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Inspektor Gadget before 0.51.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands through a crafted gadget manifest. The ig image build path copies unescaped buildOptions values from build.yaml into Makefile.build commands, allowing shell substitution during make. Exploitation requires control of the full manifest or one of its build options; commands run on the Linux host with --local or inside the build container otherwise.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-24905
- Published
- Jan 29, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 29, 2026
- Vendor
- Inspektor Gadget
- Product
- Inspektor Gadget
- Classifications
- CWE-77, CWE-78, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 29, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 29, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.48.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-79qw-g77v-2vfh build.yaml proofs of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo