Remote code execution via unsanitized ZIP paths
Published Jan 27, 2026 · Updated Jan 27, 2026
Path traversal in InfiniFlow RAGFlow 0.23.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to overwrite server files via a malicious ZIP archive. MinerUParser._extract_zip_no_root joins archive member names to the extraction directory and writes them without rejecting traversal or absolute paths. The attacker must cause the configured MinerU service to return the crafted archive; overwriting imported Python code or startup files enables code execution as the RAGFlow process.
Summary
What happened
Path traversal in InfiniFlow RAGFlow 0.23.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to overwrite server files via a malicious ZIP archive. MinerUParser._extract_zip_no_root joins archive member names to the extraction directory and writes them without rejecting traversal or absolute paths. The attacker must cause the configured MinerU service to return the crafted archive; overwriting imported Python code or startup files enables code execution as the RAGFlow process.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-24770
- Published
- Jan 27, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 27, 2026
- Vendor
- InfiniFlow
- Product
- RAGFlow
- Classifications
- T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 27, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 27, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=<= 0.23.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- MinerUParser malicious ZIP proof of conceptproof of concept · unverified
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo