Contributor-level stored XSS via unsafe HTML tags
Published Aug 26, 2026 · Updated Aug 26, 2026
Stored XSS in Design Extreme Reviews and Rating – Google Reviews 5.10 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts. The wp_display() shortcode handler accepts attacker-controlled html_tags values as raw tag names and places untrusted vicinity content between the resulting tags. Contributor-level access is required to save an affected shortcode, and the injected script executes in a user's browser when the stored page is viewed.
Summary
What happened
Stored XSS in Design Extreme Reviews and Rating – Google Reviews 5.10 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to inject scripts. The wp_display() shortcode handler accepts attacker-controlled html_tags values as raw tag names and places untrusted vicinity content between the resulting tags. Contributor-level access is required to save an affected shortcode, and the injected script executes in a user's browser when the stored page is viewed.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-2388
- Published
- Aug 26, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 26, 2026
- Vendor
- Design Extreme
- Product
- Reviews and Rating – Google Reviews
- Classifications
- CWE-79, T1059.007
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 26, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 26, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=5.10
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo