Client crash via overflowing drive-read length arithmetic
Published Jan 14, 2026 · Updated Jan 14, 2026
Heap-buffer overflow in FreeRDP before 3.20.1 allows remote attackers to crash clients through a crafted RDPDR drive read request. The drive_process_irp_read function adds four to a server-controlled 32-bit Length without preventing integer wrap, then passes that length to ReadFile against an undersized IRP output buffer. Exploitation requires a client to connect to a malicious RDP server with drive redirection active; the demonstrated result is a client crash and heap corruption.
Summary
What happened
Heap-buffer overflow in FreeRDP before 3.20.1 allows remote attackers to crash clients through a crafted RDPDR drive read request. The drive_process_irp_read function adds four to a server-controlled 32-bit Length without preventing integer wrap, then passes that length to ReadFile against an undersized IRP output buffer. Exploitation requires a client to connect to a malicious RDP server with drive redirection active; the demonstrated result is a client crash and heap corruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-22854
- Published
- Jan 14, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 14, 2026
- Vendor
- FreeRDP
- Product
- FreeRDP
- Classifications
- CWE-122, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 14, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 14, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 3.20.1
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
- Crafted RDPDR drive-read request proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo