Authenticated notification API access via missing ACLs
Published May 27, 2026 · Updated May 27, 2026
Incorrect ACLs in Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics before 10.2.0.6 and 11.0.0.0 let remote authenticated users access notification APIs. Certain API endpoints for platform mail notifications fail to apply access-control lists, but the vendor has not named the endpoints or exposed operations. A low-privileged account is required; published evidence does not specify which notification data or actions become accessible.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect ACLs in Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics before 10.2.0.6 and 11.0.0.0 let remote authenticated users access notification APIs. Certain API endpoints for platform mail notifications fail to apply access-control lists, but the vendor has not named the endpoints or exposed operations. A low-privileged account is required; published evidence does not specify which notification data or actions become accessible.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-2254
- Published
- May 27, 2026
- Updated
- May 27, 2026
- Vendor
- Hitachi Vantara
- Product
- Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
- Classifications
- CWE-732
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- May 27, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- May 27, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=10.0 <11.0.0.0
- Affected versionversion=1.0 <10.2.0.6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo