Authenticated time-entry manipulation via customfields overwrite
Published Jan 7, 2026 · Updated Jan 7, 2026
Mass assignment in the Titra REST API before 0.99.50 allows remote authenticated users to overwrite protected time-entry fields. The insertTimeCard function spreads the user-controlled customfields object after trusted values, letting arbitrary keys replace fields such as userId, hours, and state in the database document. A valid API token and project ID are required; exploitation changes stored ownership, duration, or workflow state without reported disclosure or service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Mass assignment in the Titra REST API before 0.99.50 allows remote authenticated users to overwrite protected time-entry fields. The insertTimeCard function spreads the user-controlled customfields object after trusted values, letting arbitrary keys replace fields such as userId, hours, and state in the database document. A valid API token and project ID are required; exploitation changes stored ownership, duration, or workflow state without reported disclosure or service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-21695
- Published
- Jan 7, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 7, 2026
- Vendor
- Fabian Kromer
- Product
- Titra
- Classifications
- CWE-915, T1565.001
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 7, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 7, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 0.99.50
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- GHSA-gc65-vr47-jppq proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo