Memory disclosure and crash via mismatched LUT channels
Published Jan 6, 2026 · Updated Jan 6, 2026
Heap buffer overflow in iccDEV before 2.3.1.2 allows attackers to read memory or crash an application via a malformed ICC profile. CIccTagLut8::Validate derives curve iteration counts from profile header color-space metadata instead of the channel counts parsed from the LUT, so malformed count mismatches drive validation past allocated curve arrays. Exploitation requires an application to process the crafted profile; the published assessment reports no integrity impact.
Summary
What happened
Heap buffer overflow in iccDEV before 2.3.1.2 allows attackers to read memory or crash an application via a malformed ICC profile. CIccTagLut8::Validate derives curve iteration counts from profile header color-space metadata instead of the channel counts parsed from the LUT, so malformed count mismatches drive validation past allocated curve arrays. Exploitation requires an application to process the crafted profile; the published assessment reports no integrity impact.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-21494
- Published
- Jan 6, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 6, 2026
- Vendor
- International Color Consortium
- Product
- iccDEV
- Classifications
- CWE-122, CWE-125, CWE-193
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 6, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 6, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=< 2.3.1.2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo