Root privilege escalation via unvalidated CLI input
Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Apr 15, 2026
Command injection in the CLI of Cisco Identity Services Engine allows local users to execute operating-system commands as root through crafted input. A specific CLI command insufficiently validates user-supplied input before passing it to the underlying operating system; Cisco has not disclosed the command name or parsing path. Exploitation requires local administrative CLI access and grants root privileges, enabling data access and modification without a reported service interruption.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in the CLI of Cisco Identity Services Engine allows local users to execute operating-system commands as root through crafted input. A specific CLI command insufficiently validates user-supplied input before passing it to the underlying operating system; Cisco has not disclosed the command name or parsing path. Exploitation requires local administrative CLI access and grants root privileges, enabling data access and modification without a reported service interruption.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-20136
- Published
- Apr 15, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 15, 2026
- Vendor
- ClamAV
- Product
- Cisco Identity Services Engine
- Classifications
- CWE-116, T1059
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 15, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 15, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p1
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p10
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p2
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p3
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p4
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p5
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p6
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p7
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p8
- Affected versionversion=3.1.0 p9
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0 p1
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0 p2
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0 p3
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0 p4
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0 p5
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0 p6
- Affected versionversion=3.2.0 p7
- Affected versionversion=3.2 Patch 8
- Affected versionversion=3.2 Patch 9
- Affected versionversion=3.3.0
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 1
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 10
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 2
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 3
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 4
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 5
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 6
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 7
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 8
- Affected versionversion=3.3 Patch 9
- Affected versionversion=3.4.0
- Affected versionversion=3.4 Patch 1
- Affected versionversion=3.4 Patch 2
- Affected versionversion=3.4 Patch 3
- Affected versionversion=3.4 Patch 4
- Affected versionversion=3.4 Patch 5
- Affected versionversion=3.5.0
- Affected versionversion=3.5 Patch 1
- Affected versionversion=3.5 Patch 2
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo