Code execution via undersized MRF atom declarations
Published Aug 20, 2026 · Updated Aug 20, 2026
Out-of-bounds write in GStreamer gst-plugins-good before 1.28.5 allows attackers to execute code by opening a crafted MRF file. The qtmoovrecover parser trusts atom size fields without enforcing minimum sizes, allocates undersized heap buffers, and writes atom fields beyond their boundaries. Exploitation requires explicit invocation of the recovery utility with attacker-controlled input and can corrupt data, crash the process, or run code in its context.
Summary
What happened
Out-of-bounds write in GStreamer gst-plugins-good before 1.28.5 allows attackers to execute code by opening a crafted MRF file. The qtmoovrecover parser trusts atom size fields without enforcing minimum sizes, allocates undersized heap buffers, and writes atom fields beyond their boundaries. Exploitation requires explicit invocation of the recovery utility with attacker-controlled input and can corrupt data, crash the process, or run code in its context.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-18295
- Published
- Aug 20, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 20, 2026
- Vendor
- GStreamer Project
- Product
- GStreamer
- Classifications
- CWE-787, T1204.002, T1203
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 20, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 20, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=13fcb641ed33d1472e4ffdec2846180b15405053
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo