Contributor metadata disclosure via insufficient preview authorization
Published Aug 9, 2026 · Updated Aug 9, 2026
Authorization bypass in eLightUp Slim SEO before 4.9.11 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary published-post metadata. The post-meta preview REST routes accept an attacker-chosen post ID and custom-field key but check only whether the post is readable, not whether the requester can edit it. Contributor access and a REST nonce are required; protected and private keys from published posts are exposed, while non-owned draft, private, and trashed posts remain blocked.
Summary
What happened
Authorization bypass in eLightUp Slim SEO before 4.9.11 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary published-post metadata. The post-meta preview REST routes accept an attacker-chosen post ID and custom-field key but check only whether the post is readable, not whether the requester can edit it. Contributor access and a REST nonce are required; protected and private keys from published posts are exposed, while non-owned draft, private, and trashed posts remain blocked.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-16957
- Published
- Aug 9, 2026
- Updated
- Aug 9, 2026
- Vendor
- Anh Tran
- Product
- Slim SEO
- Classifications
- CWE-639, T1213
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Aug 9, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Aug 9, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <4.9.11
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- WPScan Contributor post-meta disclosure proof of conceptfunctional · validated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo