Unauthenticated internal-service access via unrestricted callback URL
Published Mar 21, 2026 · Updated Mar 21, 2026
Server-side request forgery in Qrolic Technologies Performance Monitor 1.0.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to reach arbitrary services. The unauthenticated curl_data REST callback passes its url parameter to a cURL request without restricting schemes or destinations, including internal hosts and Gopher endpoints. Internet reachability of the WordPress endpoint is sufficient; code execution requires chaining the outbound request to a compatible service such as Redis.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in Qrolic Technologies Performance Monitor 1.0.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to reach arbitrary services. The unauthenticated curl_data REST callback passes its url parameter to a cURL request without restricting schemes or destinations, including internal hosts and Gopher endpoints. Internet reachability of the WordPress endpoint is sufficient; code execution requires chaining the outbound request to a compatible service such as Redis.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-1648
- Published
- Mar 21, 2026
- Updated
- Mar 21, 2026
- Vendor
- Qrolic Technologies
- Product
- Performance Monitor
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Mar 21, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Mar 21, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=* <=1.0.6
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo