Hidden-group disclosure via missing FGAP view filters
Published Jul 17, 2026 · Updated Jul 17, 2026
Information disclosure in Red Hat build of Keycloak allows remote authenticated users to read hidden default-group names and identifiers. RealmAdminResource and RealmsAdminResource return default groups in realm details, listings, and the default-groups endpoint without applying FGAP v2 per-group view filters. A delegated administrator needs realm-view permission while lacking view permission for specific groups; exposure is limited to group names, UUIDs, and paths.
Summary
What happened
Information disclosure in Red Hat build of Keycloak allows remote authenticated users to read hidden default-group names and identifiers. RealmAdminResource and RealmsAdminResource return default groups in realm details, listings, and the default-groups endpoint without applying FGAP v2 per-group view filters. A delegated administrator needs realm-view permission while lacking view permission for specific groups; exposure is limited to group names, UUIDs, and paths.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-16108
- Published
- Jul 17, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 17, 2026
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Red Hat build of Keycloak
- Classifications
- CWE-200, T1069
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 17, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 17, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo