Authenticated command execution via unsanitized IP parameter
Published Jan 26, 2026 · Updated Jan 26, 2026
Command injection in Sangfor OSM 3.0.0 through 3.0.12 allows remote authenticated users to execute shell commands via an HTTP POST request. The getInformation method concatenates the fortEquipmentIp parameter into a bash command without validation or escaping, then passes the string to ShellExecutor. The demonstrated request requires a valid session cookie, and injected commands run as the web application account with output returned in JSON.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in Sangfor OSM 3.0.0 through 3.0.12 allows remote authenticated users to execute shell commands via an HTTP POST request. The getInformation method concatenates the fortEquipmentIp parameter into a bash command without validation or escaping, then passes the string to ShellExecutor. The demonstrated request requires a valid session cookie, and injected commands run as the web application account with output returned in JSON.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-1414
- Published
- Jan 26, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 26, 2026
- Vendor
- Sangfor Technologies
- Product
- Operation and Maintenance Security Management System (OSM)
- Classifications
- CWE-74, CWE-77, T1059.004
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 26, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 26, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=3.0.0
- Affected versionversion=3.0.1
- Affected versionversion=3.0.10
- Affected versionversion=3.0.11
- Affected versionversion=3.0.12
- Affected versionversion=3.0.2
- Affected versionversion=3.0.3
- Affected versionversion=3.0.4
- Affected versionversion=3.0.5
- Affected versionversion=3.0.6
- Affected versionversion=3.0.7
- Affected versionversion=3.0.8
- Affected versionversion=3.0.9
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- Sangfor OSM FortEquipmentNodeController proof of conceptfunctional · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo