Remote code execution via improper bounds checking
Published Jul 17, 2026 · Updated Jul 17, 2026
Heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Storage Protect Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.1.27.1 and 8.2.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute code. IBM attributes the overwrite to improper bounds checking but has not disclosed the affected client component, input field, or parsing path. No authentication or user interaction is required, but exploitation has high complexity; consequences include system compromise or a service crash.
Summary
What happened
Heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Storage Protect Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.1.27.1 and 8.2.0.0 through 8.2.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute code. IBM attributes the overwrite to improper bounds checking but has not disclosed the affected client component, input field, or parsing path. No authentication or user interaction is required, but exploitation has high complexity; consequences include system compromise or a service crash.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-13473
- Published
- Jul 17, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 17, 2026
- Vendor
- IBM
- Product
- Storage Protect Client
- Classifications
- CWE-122, T1210
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 17, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 17, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=8.1.0.0 <=8.1.27.0, 8.1.27.1
- Affected versionversion=8.2.0.0 <=8.2.1.0
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo