Unauthenticated internal-service access via unvalidated attachment URLs
Published Jun 19, 2026 · Updated Jun 19, 2026
Server-side request forgery in Bit Integrations 2.8.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to reach internal services through attachment fields. The upload_attachment path accepts mapped WooCommerce or Google Contacts attachment URLs and fetches them server-side without restricting their destinations. Exploitation requires an enabled form integration with an attachment-capable field mapping; successful requests can read or modify reachable internal services.
Summary
What happened
Server-side request forgery in Bit Integrations 2.8.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to reach internal services through attachment fields. The upload_attachment path accepts mapped WooCommerce or Google Contacts attachment URLs and fetches them server-side without restricting their destinations. Exploitation requires an enabled form integration with an attachment-capable field mapping; successful requests can read or modify reachable internal services.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-11989
- Published
- Jun 19, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 19, 2026
- Vendor
- Bit Apps
- Product
- Bit Integrations
- Classifications
- CWE-918, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 19, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 19, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=2.8.7
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo