Extended SAML response validity via unchecked expiration
Published Jan 26, 2026 · Updated Jan 26, 2026
Missing timestamp validation in Keycloak SAML brokering allows remote attackers to extend a response's accepted lifetime. The broker processes SubjectConfirmationData without rejecting an elapsed NotOnOrAfter value, so a delayed signed response remains valid beyond its subject-confirmation window. Exploitation requires Keycloak to act as a SAML client and a user to complete the brokered flow; signatures prevent response modification or reuse for another request.
Summary
What happened
Missing timestamp validation in Keycloak SAML brokering allows remote attackers to extend a response's accepted lifetime. The broker processes SubjectConfirmationData without rejecting an elapsed NotOnOrAfter value, so a delayed signed response remains valid beyond its subject-confirmation window. Exploitation requires Keycloak to act as a SAML client and a user to complete the brokered flow; signatures prevent response modification or reuse for another request.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-1190
- Published
- Jan 26, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 26, 2026
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
- Classifications
- CWE-112
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 26, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 26, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo