Authenticated LDAP crash via SMD5 length underflow
Published Jun 9, 2026 · Updated Jun 9, 2026
Integer underflow in Red Hat 389 Directory Server allows remote authenticated users to crash the LDAP server during authentication. The SMD5 password storage plugin subtracts 16 from the length of a stored hash shorter than 16 bytes, wrapping the salt length and over-reading a buffer. Directory Manager privileges are normally required to plant the hash; with non-default nsslapd-allow-hashed-passwords enabled, a lower-privileged user can do so, and each bind to the account crashes the service again.
Summary
What happened
Integer underflow in Red Hat 389 Directory Server allows remote authenticated users to crash the LDAP server during authentication. The SMD5 password storage plugin subtracts 16 from the length of a stored hash shorter than 16 bytes, wrapping the salt length and over-reading a buffer. Directory Manager privileges are normally required to plant the hash; with non-default nsslapd-allow-hashed-passwords enabled, a lower-privileged user can do so, and each bind to the account crashes the service again.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-11789
- Published
- Jun 9, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 9, 2026
- Vendor
- 389 Directory Server
- Product
- Red Hat Directory Server
- Classifications
- CWE-191, T1499
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 9, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 9, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Affected versions are unavailable in this record. Check the vendor advisory for version and patch details.
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo