Cross-tenant file disclosure via missing access checks
Published Jul 30, 2026 · Updated Jul 30, 2026
Broken access control in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 allows remote attackers to retrieve other users' flow files. The images route accepts flow and file identifiers without authentication, while the download route authenticates callers but does not verify ownership of the requested flow. Knowledge of valid identifiers is required; image retrieval needs no account, while other file retrieval requires any authenticated account and exposes private-flow data in multi-user deployments.
Summary
What happened
Broken access control in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 allows remote attackers to retrieve other users' flow files. The images route accepts flow and file identifiers without authentication, while the download route authenticates callers but does not verify ownership of the requested flow. Knowledge of valid identifiers is required; image retrieval needs no account, while other file retrieval requires any authenticated account and exposes private-flow data in multi-user deployments.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-10700
- Published
- Jul 30, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 30, 2026
- Vendor
- OpenBMC Project
- Product
- Langflow OSS
- Classifications
- CWE-639, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 30, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 30, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1.0.0 <=1.8.4
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo