Credential phishing via unsanitized login-page color settings
Published Jun 2, 2026 · Updated Jun 2, 2026
Stored cross-site scripting in Simple Custom Login Page 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to alter the login page. The plugin stores administrator-controlled color options without a sanitize_callback and inserts them into the wp-login.php style block with esc_attr(), which does not neutralize CSS delimiters. Administrator access is required; injected CSS is rendered for unauthenticated visitors and enables UI redress and credential phishing.
Summary
What happened
Stored cross-site scripting in Simple Custom Login Page 1.0.3 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to alter the login page. The plugin stores administrator-controlled color options without a sanitize_callback and inserts them into the wp-login.php style block with esc_attr(), which does not neutralize CSS delimiters. Administrator access is required; injected CSS is rendered for unauthenticated visitors and enables UI redress and credential phishing.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-10100
- Published
- Jun 2, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 2, 2026
- Vendor
- George Pattichis
- Product
- Simple Custom Login Page
- Classifications
- CWE-79, CAPEC-63, T1056.002
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- admin
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jun 2, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jun 2, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=0 <=1.0.3
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo