Sandbox escape via unvalidated MCP config string
Published Jan 23, 2026 · Updated Jan 23, 2026
Command injection in MCP Manager for Claude Desktop allows remote attackers to escape its sandbox and execute arbitrary code. The MCP config-object processor passes a user-supplied string to an operating-system call without proper validation, allowing command syntax to alter the executed operation. Exploitation requires the target to visit a malicious page or open a malicious file; resulting code runs in the current process at medium integrity.
Summary
What happened
Command injection in MCP Manager for Claude Desktop allows remote attackers to escape its sandbox and execute arbitrary code. The MCP config-object processor passes a user-supplied string to an operating-system call without proper validation, allowing command syntax to alter the executed operation. Exploitation requires the target to visit a malicious page or open a malicious file; resulting code runs in the current process at medium integrity.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-0757
- Published
- Jan 23, 2026
- Updated
- Jan 23, 2026
- Vendor
- Ashray
- Product
- MCP Manager for Claude Desktop
- Classifications
- CWE-78, T1203
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jan 23, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jan 23, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=1140651e836cabe746f444bdc449cdd2429c4bca
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo