SYSTEM escalation via writable service binary
Published Apr 22, 2026 · Updated Apr 22, 2026
Incorrect permissions in pcvisit Remote-Host 22.6.22.1329 through 25.12.3.1744 allow local users to gain NT\SYSTEM privileges. The installer grants Everyone Modify and Write access to pcvisit_service_client.exe, allowing its contents to be replaced before service startup. A low-privileged Windows account can rename the running binary, substitute attacker-controlled code, and have it execute as NT\SYSTEM when the service restarts or the host reboots.
Summary
What happened
Incorrect permissions in pcvisit Remote-Host 22.6.22.1329 through 25.12.3.1744 allow local users to gain NT\SYSTEM privileges. The installer grants Everyone Modify and Write access to pcvisit_service_client.exe, allowing its contents to be replaced before service startup. A low-privileged Windows account can rename the running binary, substitute attacker-controlled code, and have it execute as NT\SYSTEM when the service restarts or the host reboots.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-0539
- Published
- Apr 22, 2026
- Updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- Vendor
- pcvisit Software AG
- Product
- pcvisit Remote-Host
- Classifications
- CWE-276, CAPEC-233, T1574.010
- Attack vector
- local
- Privileges
- authenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Apr 22, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Apr 22, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=22.6.22.1329 <25.12.3.1745
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
- InfoGuard Labs service-binary replacement proof of conceptproof of concept · demonstrated
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo