Satellite data disclosure or corruption via XML injection
Published Jul 9, 2026 · Updated Jul 9, 2026
XML injection in PAN-OS 10.2, 11.1, 11.2, and 12.1 allows remote attackers to disclose or corrupt LSVPN satellite data. Palo Alto Networks has not disclosed the parsing locus or the operation that fails to neutralize attacker-controlled XML before downstream processing. Reachability requires network access to a firewall running LSVPN with configured satellites; impact is limited to disclosure or corruption of internal satellite data.
Summary
What happened
XML injection in PAN-OS 10.2, 11.1, 11.2, and 12.1 allows remote attackers to disclose or corrupt LSVPN satellite data. Palo Alto Networks has not disclosed the parsing locus or the operation that fails to neutralize attacker-controlled XML before downstream processing. Reachability requires network access to a firewall running LSVPN with configured satellites; impact is limited to disclosure or corruption of internal satellite data.
The record
- CVE
- CVE-2026-0284
- Published
- Jul 9, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 9, 2026
- Vendor
- Palo Alto Networks
- Product
- PAN-OS
- Classifications
- CWE-74, CAPEC-250, T1190
- Attack vector
- network
- Privileges
- unauthenticated
Timeline
How it unfolded
- Jul 9, 2026CVE publishedPublication date reported by the CVE source.
- Jul 9, 2026Record updatedLatest update available in the CVE record.
Exploitability
Present is not the same as exploitable
Compare your product and version with the public record. A matching version still requires validation against your environment.
Is a vulnerable build present?
Compare these published version ranges with your installed build and any vendor patches.
- Affected versionversion=10.2.0 <10.2.7-h36 changes=[{"at":"10.2.7-h36","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.10-h39","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.13-h23","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.16-h9","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"10.2.18-h8","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11.1.0 <11.1.4-h35 changes=[{"at":"11.1.4-h35","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.6-h35","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.7-h8","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.10-h30","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.13-h9","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.1.16","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=11.2.0 <11.2.4-h20 changes=[{"at":"11.2.4-h20","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.2.7-h18","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.2.10-h12","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"11.2.13","status":"unaffected"}]
- Affected versionversion=12.1.0 <12.1.4-h8 changes=[{"at":"12.1.4-h8","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"12.1.7-h2","status":"unaffected"},{"at":"12.1.8","status":"unaffected"}]
What conditions does exploitation require?
What is affected?
Published CVSS scores
CVSS describes severity. EPSS estimates exploitation probability.
Attacks
What attackers are doing with it
Daily unique IPs observed by Shadowserver honeypots for known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs). Missing observations do not establish an absence of attacks.
Weakness, pattern, technique
Public exploit references
No public exploit references are available in this record.
Labels summarize the accepted research assessment. They do not indicate a test against your environment.
Technologies
Your stack
See the directory against your own environment.
Your stack
Check the software in your environment
Book a demo to see how Hinoki identifies affected software and validates exploitability in your environment.
Book a demo